Book Publishing Prices: When Will We All Wake Up?

Posted on 11/29/2007 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (2)

The book publishing industry has changed dramatically in the last decade or so and the stock photo industry has struggled to keep up with those changes. The biggest problem has been in establishing reasonable prices for increased circulation.

As late as the early 1990s, most textbook license requests were for 1/4 page under 40,000 print runs. The 1995 edition of Negotiating Stock Photo Prices listed the price for this usage at $200. Back then, it was also common to get reuse fees when a book was put back on press for a new print run. Re-use fees were 75% of the "current" fee for the same usage, not 75% of the lower initial fee charged.

At that time, getting a picture accepted for printing in a popular book was like an annuity. Every year or so, the photographer received a request to re-license the image for another printing. Photographers were willing to license the initial use for relatively small fee compared to other uses, since they would make money on future re-uses.

For example, I shot a picture of H.R. Haldeman as he was being sworn in during the Watergate hearings. This picture was used in a history textbook, and the book was reprinted many times. I received seven or eight fees over more than a decade.

Then digital printing arrived. Suddenly, short-run books were economic to produce. Custom changes and a variety of variations of a single basic title became common. That caused publishers to want rights upfront to print lots of versions of a title, including electronic versions, without having to re-license each time.



Consequently, we started seeing requests for licenses of 500,000; 1,000,000 and 1.5 million. Nothing wrong with that in principle, but what should the fee be?

One approach: a $200 fee for 40,000 would be $0.005 per book. Multiply that by the number of books, say 80,000, and you get $400. Give a little discount for the second 40,000.  Make it $350 for a total of 80,000 books. That's basically the 75% reuse fee that sellers were getting before.

But look what happens when the press run goes to 400,000. The fee for that use would be $2,000 and even if we knock off 25% for reuses, that is $1,500. Seems like a lot of money. But not really, if we compare it to what the fee would be for ten 40,000 print runs two decades ago. We're not touching cost of living increases here.

It is also important to remember that these big circulation licenses are usually for 10-year periods, and the price publishers charge for books is likely to rise significantly during that period. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Producer Price Index, between 1994 and 2004, the wholesale prices of textbooks jumped 62%. Gross revenue in 2005 for elementary, high school and higher education books sold in the U.S. was around $10 billion and growing at a rate of around 4% per year, according to the Association of American Publishers.

The National Association of College Stores says the average price of a new textbook in 2006 was $53, but some books are priced over $100. There is a real disconnect between what books cost and the amount photographers are being paid for the pictures included.

Much higher multiples should be charged for higher circulations.

Problem: High Circulations Prices

For 1/4 page, North American, English language for 40,000 copies printed over five years Corbis charges $280. For 10 years, it is $350. These are not bad prices for a 40,000 print run. But the problem arises when all that additional circulation is added. Below are the multiples that Corbis charges for various higher circulations. Take note: Corbis' rates are better than most.

Corbis 2007
40Kbase price
80K

1.08

120K

1.14

250K

1.26

500K

1.34

750K

1.66

1,000,000

1.97

For 1,000,000 copies of a book, it costs the publisher $690 per picture. (Publishers can get a picture for $260 at Getty.) One hundred pictures in a book will cost the publisher about $0.07 per book, not for each picture, but for all 100.

Given these costs, the pictures in books certainly aren't valued at much. The amount paid for pictures has gone down as the cost of books has gone up. If the big guys in our industry aren't going to try to hold the line on usage fees, there isn't much hope for the rest of us.

 


Copyright © 2007 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  

Comments

  • Jeff Schultz Posted Nov 30, 2007
    Jim;

    I agree whole-heartily. The publishing houses are asking for MUCH longer licensing terms and some say the press run is the same during the whole term---but really how can that be?! And they are asking us to drop prices. We can't stay in business that way when cost of living is going up. We can only cut expenses so much. This indstry is in need of some reform. So, Jim, what's the answer?

  • Mark & Audrey Gibson Posted Dec 3, 2007
    In 2004 many of our regular publishing clients wished to set up vendor agreements for pricing. This was at a time when more and more expanded rights were being requested, and they wanted some standard pricing on what to expect in the future. The fees we agreed to have worked well for us for the last few years. Now, with Corbis and Getty more and more on the textbook scene, our 2004 agreements are looking pricey to our long time clients. One client has suggested that we declare our pricing agreements "expired" and issue invoices based on "non vendor" basis. Another photo researcher says the publishing companies have no incentive to review pricing structures for stock photography with so many resources available.

    Supply and demand folks, how to educate the publishers who make the pricing decisions with the kinds of statistics that Jim presents here?

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff